{"id":76716,"date":"2016-01-12T08:47:41","date_gmt":"2016-01-12T08:47:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/6toplists.com\/?p=76716"},"modified":"2017-12-15T15:03:25","modified_gmt":"2017-12-15T15:03:25","slug":"6-films-with-over-95-rating-on-rotten-tomatoes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/6toplists.com\/?p=76716","title":{"rendered":"6 Films with over 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\t\t\t Watch Them All on Amazon\n\t\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nA Trip to the Moon<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nThe Great Train Robbery<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nCabiria<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nThe Birth of a Nation<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nThe Cabinet of Dr Caligari<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nThe Kid<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

These are the kind of movies that make your viewing a waste of your precious time as well as wanting that Men In Black come over to your place and flash the hell out<\/a> of your guts only you won\u2019t be able to remember the crap you just previewed.<\/p>\n

Some of them are a simple \u201cartistic\u201d attempt over creating something \u201cbeautiful\u201d so as the world could admire it and say\u201d Wow, this life has so much to offer<\/em>\u201d, but instead makes you that in some cases like the followings that life could be able to take as well.<\/p>\n

Yea, life is able to take the loved ones from your side; it should be able to take this crappy stories as well for much as I\u2019m concerned. This are the kind of movies you must be paid in order to see them and still not enough to be able to function as a proper human being.<\/p>\n

\n

6. The Kid(1921) – O Garoto<\/h2>\n

\"worst<\/p>\n

Charlie Chaplin. At last a name that I recognize and which I can resonate with. \u00a0Written, Produced and Directed by the one and only Charlie Chaplin<\/a>. \u201cA picture with a smile-and perhaps, a tear<\/em>\u201d saying at the beginning wanting to underline the single style known of him, a simple man, in search of peace, and of course tearing the smiles out of people\u2019s faces.<\/p>\n

Wonderful picture transcending not like in the same era The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari<\/a>. What amused me was the fact that at the very beginning the lady with the child was all alone in the park and the film stood up in underlining this fact by putting a picture of \u201cAlone\u201d \u2013d\u2019uh, we can all see that.<\/p>\n

Nonetheless this movie really made me smile, fairly making any sense but a good movie anyway. I think I\u2019m more subjective than objective having Charlie Chaplin as the main actor, but some critics say this is not something to be looking after for in case you want to be inspired for another art form.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n

“ Tearing the smiles out of people\u2019s faces ”<\/p>\n

\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

It had a huge success in his time, being the second grossing film behind the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse<\/a>.\u00a0 The preservation of the film was done very good without any dead scenes or spots on the roll, being selected in 2011 for keeping in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress, being \u201cculturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n

Cast<\/h2>\n

It starred in most of the film Charlie Chaplin as A Tramp, Jackie Coogan as The Child (\u201cJohn\u201d), Edna Purviance<\/a> as The Woman, Carl Miller as The Man, Tom Wilson as The Policeman, Henry Bergman as Night shelter keeper\/Professor Guido, Charles Reisner as Neighborhood bully, Raymond Lee as Bully\u2019s little brother, Lita Grey as Flirtatious Angel, Jules Hanft as the country doctor-loved his comedy perspective, very impulsive for that period and really neurotic push, anyway, he played a doc, so you must understand docs are not in for jokes in that manor, but he eclipsed Charlie Chaplin for a brief period.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=VmDWlm3O8Sk<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

5. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)<\/h2>\n

\"first<\/p>\n

One of the first horror film ever released in history, considering the fact that even though Germans, being a German production, had a very rough time near that period of time right around the corner of World War I, having lots of inspiration sources to suck upon.<\/p>\n

Critic Roger Ebert<\/a> called it (debatable)\u201d the first true horror film<\/em>\u201d, and film reviewer Danny Peary called it cinema\u2019s first cult film and predecessor to arthouse films.<\/p>\n

One of the main actors looks just like Charlie Sheen<\/a> and his fianc\u00e9e in the movie resembles a man most of the time. Not to mention everybody looks so damn pale, I understand it\u2019s a horror movie but they should\u2019ve let it softer with the talc.<\/p>\n

\n
Related<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
Read article: <\/span>
Top 10 Worst Horror Movies<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

I must be clear – at this \u201chorror movie\u201d I almost fell asleep, so scary and deep it was, I couldn\u2019t even see blood, only some funky shadows fighting on the wall.<\/p>\n

Where are the frightening, the horror, the blood baths and decapitations? Truly an hour of wasted life. Even the background, all made out of cardboard in various shapes, made me feel that all the movie was shot in a since place, with no outside communication, none at all, considering the fact that mostly the shots were in so called forests and town.<\/p>\n

Really retarded but most people consider it the quintessential work of German Expressionist cinema, \u201cmost widely discussed film of the time<\/em>\u201d- Of course, cause it\u2019s retarded.<\/p>\n

Cast<\/h2>\n

Werner Krauss<\/a> as Dr. Caligari, Conrad Veidt as Cesare, Friedrich Feher as Francis, Lil Dagover as Jane Olsen, Hans Heinrich von Twardowski as Alan and Rudolf Lettinger as Dr. Olse. The rest don\u2019t count but in my opinion not even the first count at something. It\u2019s a poetry of a film and nobody likes poetry.<\/p>\n